It doesn’t take a mathlete to calculate the cost of Orbán’s last sixteen years. Elected in 2010 after four earlier years as prime minister and eight as obstructionist member of parliament, he reassumed office with a two-thirds supermajority in the parliament and a full-throttle shift to the authoritarian right. He rewrote the country’s fundamental laws (its constitution), took nearly complete control of all national media, and remade the nation through a system of cronyism and corruption that brought staggering power and riches to himself and his chums. Orbán managed the rare feat of projecting dictatorial invincibility behind a façade of democracy, exerting near total dominance with little use of military or constabulary force. All of this made him a hero of American ultraconservatives, white supremacists, Christian nationalists, and capitalist pirates. Orbán was, as Steve Bannon famously said, “Trump before Trump.”
This story is about just one part of the Hungarian “illiberal” blueprint our current administration has followed: the attack on higher education. The Trump administration’s legal and extortionist assault on universities has been shocking. These attempts to dismantle a nation’s higher education system and bend it to the will of an authoritarian government draw inspiration from Orbán’s radical overhaul of Hungary’s public universities. Orbán’s Fidesz party used the cover of relentless, systematic attacks on “woke ideology” and alleged LGBTQ+ “indoctrination” to seize hold of the schools. His government’s so-called “model change,” a euphemism for “privatization” and “takeover,” has been a stupefying success. It has eradicated all university autonomy, determined what gets taught and by whom, and effectively transferred the assets of public universities into private, loyalist hands.
Of all the universities in that country, only one fought back. Guess which one… (You win!)
Beginning in 2020, this hostile takeover provoked mass protests from the students, faculty, and administration at the University of Theater and Film Arts (SZFE), sparking a movement that, while small, changed the course of lives and was heard around the world. After Kafkaesque attempts at negotiation and Bleak House-style legal battles, SZFE’s administrative leaders, followed by over half the faculty, resigned. Together, students and teachers created the Learning Republic, a community-based educational program to continue training amidst their David-and-Goliath struggle. Rather than admit the new, wildly antagonistic, government-appointed leadership, the students launched a blockade of university buildings and a brilliant repertoire of daily, performative demonstrations and ritualized actions, replete with sharable and often viral visual design elements—the kind of playful, exuberant, and super-catchy public protests whose spirited influence can currently be felt in our own “No Kings” rallies.
There’s every reason to believe that these daily activities, which lasted seventy-one days before being shut down by a second COVID wave, roused a sleepy, depressed, even hopeless populace. Certainly their street actions set the scene for a rising tide of protest that peaked in the “illegal” Pride parades throughout Hungary in 2025 and excited the courage, participation, and widespread resistance that surged on 12 April to win. But, as that unstoppable theatre kid Lin-Manuel Miranda wrote in Hamilton, “Oceans rise; Empires fall.”
Comments
The article is just the start of the conversation—we want to know what you think about this subject, too! HowlRound is a space for knowledge-sharing, and we welcome spirited, thoughtful, and on-topic dialogue. Find our full comments policy here.
Todd,
Thank you for extracting the "lessons" from the wonderful work of the Hungarian theater kids. It might be of interest to you –– and others in the performing arts –– to know that 9 of the 10 lessons you mention were also learned by Junior Programs, Inc., a professional American touring performing arts company (drama, opera, ballet) in the 1930s and early '40s. They were considered the "gold standard" for TYA theaters back then, and in many ways, that period of American history was similar to the one through which we are now living. Fascism was on the rise, democracy was being threatened, and the specter of a second world war loomed large.
Junior Programs' mission was to use the performing arts to prepare the next generation to be active citizens in a democracy. Preserving democracy and a culture that supported democracy was an overarching goal. The plays they commissioned were focused on countering the racist "othering" to which the various communities of color were subjected by the larger society, and by Hollywood in particular: each production depicted the children of different cultural and racial communities as appealing, fun loving, thoughtful, possessing courage, agency, and creativity; just the kind of kids a youthful American audience would like to have as neighbors.
They used the performing arts as a catalyst –– creating an audience of four million children –– to build community and coalitions across disciplines, generations, and divisive cultural, racial, economic and religious boundaries. For Junior Programs to come and perform, a city or town had to create a "sponsoring committee" –– a broad-based coalition of local volunteers from the civic, social, educational and business communities. This committee was responsible for all the local administrative work needed to prepare for the actual performance. This created a level of community ownership seldom seen among TYA theaters today. Junior Programs also collaborated with leading institutions of higher ed to create tailored curriculums based on the subject matter and culture of the production. For their play about Native American children, there were modules not only for K-12 classes in drama, music and dance, but for history, social studies, literature, art, home economics, shop and gym. For their play about Brazilian children, there were all of the above and additional modules on geography, economics, and a discussion of the differences between Brazilian and American forms of slavery. The public schools and K-12 front-line teachers became vocal allies, welcoming these curriculum enriching modules, sent to the schools three months prior to each production. Their play about how a group of high school students organized to save their town from a dictatorial mayor was a joyful mix of fantasy, reality, song and dance.
They knew that democracy could never be a 'one and done;' that it would take the work of every generation to make it real. They viewed every challenge (artistic and otherwise) as an opportunity to find a creative solution; and they consistently used the performing arts to create community and educational partnerships designed to make the core values of democracy exciting, alive and relevant for the nation's youngsters –– part of their everyday lives. For Junior Programs, being entertaining was essential, but they knew the performing arts were much much more than entertainment. Hundreds of local news accounts and reviews attest to their long string of artistic, educational and community successes, and my recent book, More Than Entertainment: Democracy and the Performing Arts –– Junior Programs, Inc., (1936 - 1943) Pioneers of Theater for Young Audiences offers not only a detailed account of what they did and what they learned, but provides a series of relevant recommendations based on those learnings for the challenges facing today's TYA practitioners. Perhaps the inspiration of these two sets of lessons capture a universality that transcends time and geography.