Facing Facts

Artists Need an Entrepreneurial Mindset Part 2

“No one is coming.”—Andrew Simonet, Making Your Life as an Artist

The attention generated by the first essay I wrote for HowlRound on artist entrepreneurship made me elated and depressed simultaneously. It was obviously hitting a nerve of many in the live arts whose training gave them no foundation for how to actually make a living.

Although there were many college and university faculty members from various institutions that came forward in the Disqus section to demonstrate that there are, in fact, programs that prepare students for the marketplace (if there is a centralized website listing all of them, I haven’t found it), there is still a disconnect for most artists between their creative practice and the pragmatic skill set necessary to make a go of it in the real world. There are great resource documents available, some of which I’ve collected in this Google Drive folder I send to my students post-workshop. But while it’s great to have this info available, if you don’t have any reference for it, it’s not that helpful.

In 2013 I attended an Arts Policy symposium hosted by Arts Extension at UMASS. The various discussions and presentations were muted by a publication that was handed out, How A Nation Engages with Art. Click on the link and scroll down to page 17 and perhaps you’ll have the same reaction I did. In the left bottom corner is a statistic: a negative 12 percent decline in non-musical play attendance between 2008–2012. Negative. 12. Percent. I instagrammed a close up of the visual and wrote “Welcome to theatre, folks.”

The quote above by Simonet rings loud and clear. If you expect something to just happen, that you’ll be in the right place at the right time, that there is a line of people with money just waiting to recognize your talent and catapult your career into the world, you are gravely mistaken. Although we can point to the Great Recession as an instigator for the decline in theatre attendance, the fact remains that to make a life in the performing arts you have to be wicked scrappy, rethinking and revising innovative approaches of how to push your art into an oversaturated marketplace.

The word entrepreneur in my HowlRound article seemed to confuse and trigger a handful of people. When Shawn C. Harris tweeted me Jeffrey Nytch’s excellent analysis of Entrepreneurship Porn in the higher ed field, I knew I had to get more specific about what I mean.

If you Google entrepreneur, here’s what you get:

en·tre·pre·neur

noun

a person who organizes and operates a business or businesses, taking on greater than normal financial risks in order to do so.

synonyms businessman/businesswoman, enterpriser, speculator, tycoon, magnate, mogul;

  • a promoter in the entertainment industry.

If that definition (especially the part about taking on greater than normal financial risks) doesn’t speak to what we consistently have to endure in this field, I don’t know what does. The secondary definition is also striking: a promoter in the entertainment industry. Without getting into the debate about entertainment versus art, this captures what we are all trying to do.

Nytch’s clarity about pounding the pavement (the skill set necessary to make others aware of your work) vs. entrepreneurship (the strategic mindset of being consistently adaptable to the needs of others) cannot be underestimated. The workshops I teach as crash courses are about the overall business skill set artists need and how to implement them if artists are going to thrive trying to do their own work. The entrepreneurial mindset is something artists organically and intuitively bring to their art without even realizing it. When you notice that not only do you have to be forever adaptable to changes that are beyond your control but actually embrace that challenge, then the mindset is inherent.

In the comments on my first essay and Twitter chat on #howlround that followed, a few people pointed out the necessary distinction between being an entrepreneur and an entrepreneurial mindset that we need to embrace.

Artists tend to be visionary in their work, able to tap into cultural shifts and ideologies before they even come to fruition. How do we parallel that incredible futuristic insight towards the needs of an audience while simultaneously dealing with all of the production demands it takes just to get a show on its feet? That is the Achilles heel we all have to come to terms with.

If you expect something to just happen, that you’ll be in the right place at the right time, that there is a line of people with money just waiting to recognize your talent and catapult your career into the world, you are gravely mistaken.

a poster
From the process and development of the Easthampton Co.Lab, a coworking and community space recently co-founded by Lepore as a home for people, place, and purpose. Photo courtesy of Seth Lepore.

First, here are some options for building a foundation for your work to get you thinking both pragmatically and creatively in directions that will benefit you and others.

Develop a cohort of trusted allies in the field to learn new skill sets.

Most people feel like they are alone in their efforts to make a go of it in the arts. Be proactive and start a cohort of trusted allies to speak with at least once a month about the ins and outs of the field. Talk about challenges, frustrations, successes, new models of audience engagement, and face-palming failures. When you speak with other artists in your field who are at the same career level, you create a fellowship which can lead to a better understanding of what works and what doesn’t.

Spend time developing best practices that can serve the group as a whole. Give each other homework and get yours done. Suggest that each month one person bring a unique problem or circumstance to the group and then focus on how to serve that person’s need. By addressing specific issues, members can learn invaluable methodologies.

Develop a board of advisors.

Mentors who have been in the field longer than you have an immense amount of life experience and deep understanding of the field that you need to access. From arts presenters, directors of service organizations, to retired faculty, gathering together an advisory board of people who are passionate about your vision will not only give you insights into your five-year plan (yeah, you need that too), but stop you from going off track. People who honor your creative process will also be served by being exposed to other colleagues on your board. Relationships can bloom from this cross-pollination of unique and strategic insights and can end up leading to small and large changes in the field; it all starts with challenging conversations that come from a place of deep caring.

Research other models of income for the live arts.

Ticket sales aren’t enough. The field freaks out about this on a regular basis. Duck! Here comes another panel on community engagement! How do we find alternative methods of reaching audiences and monetize that impact? From livestreaming to temporary pop-up stages, there have been many experiments how to go about this but there is no concrete solution, because what will work in one community will backfire in another only five miles down the road.

It’s important to understand the needs of each community and assess for yourself whether you even want to consider innovative methods of engagement, or whether you’re just in it for the potential funding. The passion and the need must align. What models are you using, how can they be tweaked, how can you measure the changes to benefit as many people as possible?

Secondly, here are things that we all need to advocate for in the field. We need to shift the landscape dramatically (no pun intended) to break down the hierarchy of artist/ funder/ academic institution/service organization.

We need to face the academic hurdles of access to this skill set head on.

Nytch’s post should make us take heed. Are arts entrepreneurship programs getting thrown together in order to compete for student dollars while appropriating the wrong language to sell basic skills under the premise of being your own boss? We need the fundamentals of marketing, fundraising, publicity, and identity-building being taught as early as freshman year in the university system, but we need to make it apparent that this should be an integral part of the curriculum and not an add-on, nor a certificate outside of the regular program. (Also there’s nothing special about being an entrepreneur. It’s fucking hard.)

The skills necessary to do well in the world are just as important as stage time. A weekend crash course like the one I teach is a step in the right direction, but it isn’t enough. Access to this knowledge needs to be more readily available and a system to measure and report metrics needs to be implemented. Students will feel empowered to see how entrepreneurial skills are transferable in many fields besides the arts.

We need a nationwide call to arms of all alumni and current students of arts programs at the BA level and up to make the faculty and administration aware of this critical issue. They need to get it on a cellular level. Careers will perish without the knowledge to make the work visible and sustainable. How do we get our voices heard in this context?

All the programs that currently exist for arts entrepreneurship and skill building developed by service organizations and academic institutions need to work together for the betterment of the field instead of being siloed.

Service organizations and academic institutions who currently teach ongoing skill building in the areas of arts professional development need to work in tandem, and come to agreements on best practices that can be shared as part of an educational commons. Proprietary methodology creates competitive resistance that has no place in the field. Let’s create the reality of overlapping support structures that bring everyone up to the same level.

The field changes at a rapid pace. It is to the benefit of all local, regional, and national organizations and institutions that serve artists to be building an infrastructure that works for the betterment of all involved instead of making decisions based on the fear of funder/donor requirements. Transparency is the name of the game here. Being a service organization goes back to the simplicity of being of service.

Are your local and/or regional service organizations working on a national level to make this information accessible, sharable, and updated as needed? Are you a part of one of these organizations? We need a call to action for advocates to work together so that we all can benefit.

Be an advocate not only for yourself but also for the field as a whole. An entrepreneurial mindset is not one of autonomous isolation but altruistic noncompetitive transparency.

post it notes
From the process and development of the Easthampton Co.Lab. Photo courtesy of Seth Lepore.

Things to leave you with:

Are you getting yourself in the mindset to take your career by the horns and create effective change that is sustainable for yourself? Don’t isolate. Reach out, create cohorts and advisory boards that can assist you in thriving.

Are you learning the skill set necessary to get your career in order? Does your college need to know where they failed you? Are your go-to art service organizations working towards systematic change or are they stuck in the fear-based comfort of funder-approved educational tools?

Be an advocate not only for yourself but also for the field as a whole. An entrepreneurial mindset is not one of autonomous isolation but altruistic noncompetitive transparency. It is possible that we can all succeed beside one another.

Bookmark this page

Log in to add a bookmark
Thoughts from the curator

This series introduces basic tenets of spectacle-based drama and is rooted in the touring experiences, laboratory practices, international travel, and broader performance community of The Carpetbag Brigade.

Entrepreneurial Mindset Series by Seth Lepore

Interested in following this conversation in real time? Receive email alerting you to new threads and the continuation of current threads.

subscribe

Comments

9
Add Comment
Newest First

Hi Seth - This is a great article. I also find that along with the lack of the education of business or audience building skills there is a large problem with options that are too high cost to be of a benefit to the creative type. If you can afford $150 an hour, you probably do not need the service. I designed www.wuzzleit.com to be a solution to just that. At a cost of $5 a month for students and $7 a month for non students it is an affordable solution to this problem. I will be adding more content weekly in the form of downloads, video and guides. It is past time for creatives to have a solution to this problem. Thanks so much for you insightful thoughts on the topic.

Hi Seth,My name is Jasmine Williams, and I am the Programs Coordinator at the Center for

Cultural Innovation. After reading this article, as a fellow artist myself , I was moved. Whatwas mentioned about service organizations working together is valid. In that respect, CCI is always interested in collaborating and finding ways that we can help artists advance further with their careergoals. I would like to share our resources. I have posted links below. Our goal is to fill in the gaps and provide artists with tools to lead and define their own career by promoting knowledge sharing, networking, and financial independence through our grant programs and artists resources. We provide responsive business training, information services,incubation, access to capital and benefits, and advocacy for a wide range of self employed artists.

Our signature program is an intensive, entrepreneurial workshop series called the Business ofArt™ , which is designed to give artists at all levels, working in all disciplines, knowledge about basic business principles and career development issues that will affect an artist’s life. Our book, Businessof Art: An Artist’s Guide to Profitable Self-Employment, provides artists with tools through reflection and exercises. We actively collaborate with other service providers in the field through our professional development grants programs, calendar of events, and resource directory. With that being said, please consider us an ally. We are open to collaborations and any ideas to serve the artist community.

Website: http://www.cciarts.org/

Funding & Grantshttp://www.cciarts.org/fund...

Resource Directory for Artists http://www.cciarts.org/cgi/...

Business of Art Book:http://www.cciarts.org/Publ...

Thanks, Jasmine. It's always good to know about more programs that exist like yours. It would be great to be in touch about your programs and potential collaborations. I'm glad that you recognize the value in service organizations working in tandem. It's a way to strengthen the field as a whole.

Hi Seth:There are so many thoughts going through my head as I read this. It sort of makes me feel a little ADD (and I don't mean that in a bad way). There are so many connecting points to creative entrpreneurship, artists as business people, organization as arts businesses, programs at the academic level and programs in community, resource centers online, knowledge bases accessible and available to help get more information out etc etc. What struck me as I neared the end of the blogpost was that academic programs are important, but community programs in artist and creative training in self-employement and business development are as important if not in some ways more so. With the proliferation of arts management programs and the role they've played in raising the bar for career training in the arts, we must also remember that not everyone will be able to afford higher academic training, and not everyone should feel that the only way to get the kind of business and career skills training is in academia. I would love to see support from folks like Tremaine or the NEA or whoever to help create more creative/artist training in communities through local arts agencies, services organizations (which are dwindling at the local level) or other community-based efforts by individuals who have the experience and skills to provide training. Many are going out on their own because jobs aren't always available that fit with their particular skills set or professional passions. It's not just about autonomy or the latest trend to be an entrepreneur. For some of us, there is no other way to do what we do. Thanks Seth for a great conversation starter. Victoria Plettner-Saunders - artcareercafe.com

Thanks Victoria for your insights. For me it's a blend of grassroots artist to artist co-learning, service orgs helping to sustain and subsidize that learning and academia getting on board. I think that universities are the slowest to adjust but with people like Linda (who commented above) there's some movement.

Yes, we need solid funding in place but we can also do this in clusters where skills are shared and new models are developed in co-op style. I'm currently researching models that work, ones that outdated, ones we cling to for dear life, ones that are just starting to bubble. In the end I want artists to feel empowered to take ownership of their career trajectory and to demand that what they do has worth both on a social level as well as financially.

HI Seth:For a report on and listing of field-based arts business training, see our report for the Tremaine Foundation, available here: http://filmdancetheatre.asu...For a centralized list of academic programs in arts entrepreneurship see: http://www.societyaee.org/r...

Our (i.e. The Pave Program in Arts Entrepreneurship at Arizona State University) work with the Tremaine Foundation, and their work more generally, is developing to answer the very call to action you make by providing resources and linkages across arts services organizations, schools, and artists. The sharing of "best practices" in arts entrepreneurship education, especially in higher ed, is also disseminated at academic conferences and through publications such as "Artivate: A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts" (artivate.org) that has published several articles on the topic, with two more coming later this month.You're right - there's no one central clearinghouse - but there is a recently formed academic society to address arts entrepreneurship education in higher ed and action being taken by funders to create the kind of clearinghouse for field-based education you call for. (Check back with us in about six months.) Field building is an iterative and at times slow process but we'll get there - because we have to.All the best,Linda