Along with pursuing a freelance career as a dramaturg and writer, I spent the first year of the pandemic as a fundraiser for a midsize theatre company. Specifically, I was the grant writer, responsible for providing roughly a third of the organization’s revenue. It was about as much fun as you imagine.
When the pandemic began, there was a mad dash to triage. Applications to new COVID-relief grants sprang up, doubling and tripling the workload in the development department as we did our part to keep the theatre afloat. But as our company figured out next steps and we sent out a flurry of applications, other foundations determined that now was not the time to open their coffers wider. For every foundation that released more money in response to the increased need, there was another that pretended it was still business as usual. I couldn’t decide which made me angrier: the foundations that stuck to their scant 5 percent release of their investments (the bare minimum mandated by law) or the ones that gave more money than usual—signaling that they could have done this long before now. Meanwhile, the government’s first-come-first-served approach to funding (and its relatively meager pool of money to disburse) left many nonprofits to fend for themselves.
There is always a degree of uncertainty when it comes to fundraising, but this year exacerbated an already tenuous enterprise. And though I’ve seen genuine shows of generosity and camaraderie in our field in the face of this increased struggle, I’ve also seen with nauseating clarity how the nonprofit system continues to fail the arts and cause inequities among us.
COVID-19 may be (hopefully) on its way out, but there’s been a figurative disease that has been ravaging us much longer: the scarcity mindset. Competition is an intrinsic part of the design of nonprofit theatre. Kill or be killed, produce or perish. Rarely feast, often famine, so get resources and hold onto them tightly, because you never know when it could all be taken away from you. These hellish mantras have become even more entrenched during the pandemic, when a $10,000 relief grant might be the only thing saving a managing director from having to furlough yet another employee.
This situation wasn’t created by the arts field, but I wonder to what degree we’ve simply resigned ourselves to a system that serves few at the expense of many. The not-so-well-kept secret is that the nonprofit industrial complex protects and serves white-led institutions, leaving organizations helmed by global majority folx with the scraps of the scraps. This cannot be acceptable to any artist, arts worker, or leader at an arts nonprofit that is seeking to create practices framed with an anti-racist lens and embrace equity, diversity, and inclusion.
We’ve all been saying that there is no going back to normal once we’re all able to be back in the room together again, but what does that mean when it comes to the resources that we have? If the nonprofit system isn’t going to be reliable, can we become more self-reliant by eschewing individualism in favor of collective organizing and resource sharing?
COVID-19 may be (hopefully) on its way out, but there’s been a figurative disease that has been ravaging us much longer: the scarcity mindset.
The good news is there’s plenty of evidence from this past year to suggest that we can be creative with what we’ve got and generous and ethical in our practices moving forward. Theatres have converted their costume shops to make crucial PPE for healthcare workers and the general public. Last summer, companies across the country with their own buildings opened their doors to provide a haven for protesters and gave them free food from their concession stocks. Archived productions were streamed to the public with proceeds split between the producing company and other local nonprofits and mission-driven initiatives.
We can even carry over lessons from this season when considering budgets for future productions and artistic programming. Plenty of companies created dynamic Zoom productions of plays that they originally planned to stage in-person, and they did it at a fraction of the original budget. For instance, Philadelphia Theatre Company’s digital production of Sarah DeLappe’s The Wolves clocked in at $55,000 instead of the $350,000 planned for the in-person version. We can make thrilling pieces of art without shelling out millions. It is possible. Intense creativity can come from limitations.
Comments
The article is just the start of the conversation—we want to know what you think about this subject, too! HowlRound is a space for knowledge-sharing, and we welcome spirited, thoughtful, and on-topic dialogue. Find our full comments policy here
I came up in theater in Chicago, where theaters constantly worked together in the way you imagine. It's one of the reasons, that Chicago went from a city with almost no local professional theater to the second largest theater community in the nation in less than a decade. It still works that way there, in large part. I would suggest that everyone read Mark Larson's book, "Ensemble", which not only is a history of the Chicago theater movement, but also describes how all theaters in Chicago are part of a single Ensemble that works together for the good of all. I would be happy to talk about my experience in Chicago theater to anyone who would be willing to listen. It can be very instructive.
I came up in theater in Chicago, where theaters constantly worked together in the way you imagine. It's one of the reasons, that Chicago went from a city with almost no local professional theater to the second largest theater community in the nation in less than a decade. It still works that way there, in large part. I would suggest that everyone read Mark Larson's book, "Ensemble", which not only is a history of the Chicago theater movement, but also describes how all theaters in Chicago are part of a single Ensemble that works together for the good of all. I would be happy to talk about my experience in Chicago theater to anyone who would be willing to listen. It can be very instructive.
As someone who's interested in learning about anti-capitalist development, granting, and business, this was inspiring and interesting! So many received ideas about finance and scarcity are actually just hegemonic bunk; there seems to be a lack of creativity in challenging the financial side of the non-profit system and I think that needs to change. Do you or does anyone know of organizations who are doing that well? I am very interested in learning about this more!
So glad you're interested in learning more! If you haven't checked it out already, I highly recommend reading The Revolution Will Not Be Funded by INCITE! Women, Gender Non-Conforming, and Trans people of Color Against Violence (formerly known as INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence). It's a book of essays and transcripts of speeches by folks actively working against and/or questioning the non-profit industrial complex, and it was one of the first books that lit my own anti-capitalist fundraising fire.