fbpx School Days | HowlRound Theatre Commons

School Days

Theater, Baseball, and Honoring the Audience

This is the first post of the School Days series, which solicits submissions from undergraduate theatermakers from around the country. This series is curated by Sarah Bartley.

I like theater. But I love baseball. A lot of my theater friends look down on baseball, and sports in general, and I really don’t get it. Theater and baseball aren’t all that different! They’re ultimately both about bringing people together as a community to collectively engage with a live experience. Anyone who’s heard the crowd roar at a Broadway house and at Shea Stadium can tell you that. Like theater, baseball knows that one of its greatest strengths is the excitement it generates in its audience from the tension created by narrative. And the players need that energy from the fans just as theater artists thrive on an engaged, receptive audience.

Taking their similarities into account, I think there’s a lot that theater might learn from baseball—about narrative, about atmosphere, about community. Let’s start with what theater could learn from baseball about honoring its audience. Toward the end of the 2010 baseball season, Tampa Bay Rays third-baseman Evan Longoria described fans’ low attendance at games as “disheartening.” The immediate reaction to Longoria’s comments ranged from criticism to outrage, from both Tampa Bay fans and national sports media. That same day I noticed a friend’s status on Facebook. My friend, a BFA theater student at a well-regarded school, was complaining about the audience’s “inappropriate” attire to a school production. The reaction to his status was almost universal in agreement: theater audiences showed a lack of respect to the “art” by coming to a show in shorts and flip-flops. The comment was similar to many I’d heard from theater artists disillusioned by audiences who don’t function the way they want them to: low attendance, audiences who don’t “get” the work—you get the picture.

Evan Longoria swinging a bat.
Evan Longoria. Photo by Keith Allison

There was some validity to Evan Longoria’s statements. The Rays, ranked by ESPN as one of the best deals in all of sports, were one game away from clinching a spot in the play-offs (for only the second time in franchise history). They were playing energetic, exciting ball, from the mound to the base paths to the outfield and by all standards putting on a good show. But for Longoria and others, their success wasn’t felt as such without the roar of the crowd. On some level, baseball is played for the fans. Longoria was quick to apologize to the fans. The Tampa Bay Rays organization was even quicker to look for ways to let their fan base know how much they were valued. For the next home game, 20,000 tickets were made available, free to the public. Baseball organizations pride themselves on being institutions of entertainment, athleticism, competition, but they acknowledge, as the Tampa Bay Rays did, that they are, above all, a service to the public.

Similarly, regardless of the other wonderful things it is (art, entertainment) theater is a service. And its creators are in service to its audience. I understand my friend’s complaint. Actors, directors, dramaturgs, managers and designers put hundreds of hours into production. Often, the emotional commitment is even more taxing than the time commitment. It’s easy to be sensitive. It’s easy to take anything but the utmost sign of reverence as disrespect. It’s easy to get angry with an audience, especially as a young and insecure artist. I’ve done it frequently. But I have to constantly remind myself that I started doing theater because I wanted to serve and create theater for an audience.

When someone chooses to go to the stadium or to the theater, he is choosing to spend his money and time on this experience we create as artists or players. Considering all we have to spend our money and time on, that’s a pretty amazing choice. It means he sees your work as making a valuable contribution to his life, just as he sees value in the work of his auto-mechanic, of his plumber, and of his doctor. We have a responsibility to honor his choice to spend time and money on us—to entertain, to inspire, and to challenge. In the best of times, we can even open a door to a new way of thinking. And if we see that audiences are not making the choice to spend their time and money with us, rather than complain, we’ve got to figure out why and do something about it.

...as a young theater artist coming up in the industry, I am interested in figuring out ways we might work to make our audiences feel more honored, welcomed, and appreciated before they enter the theater and long after they’ve left.

It’s on us to get the audience into the theater or the stadium. Like Longoria learned, frustrating though it may be, we’ll never fill a house by complaining about or dishonoring its inhabitants. And here’s where we might learn something from baseball. When Longoria apologized and the Tampa Bay Rays offered 20,000 free tickets, they honored their fans and showed them how much they were valued. Of course this was a huge gesture and not one that is easily replicable or realistic for theaters. But as a young theater artist coming up in the industry, I am interested in figuring out ways we might work to make our audiences feel more honored, welcomed, and appreciated before they enter the theater and long after they’ve left.

I am grateful for and inspired by the many theater makers and companies already working to honor their audiences. As a poor college student, I appreciate every student rush out there. It’s not only a great way to get young people into see your show, but also to say unequivocally: we value your presence. I appreciate initiatives by companies like Soho Rep with its 99-cent Sunday ticket program, and New York Theater Workshop with the 4th Street Bar Association, and any theater with any program whose aim is to make theater more accessible and welcoming to audiences. Educational programming, the outreach classes, community involvement—all of these things work towards one central goal of better engaging and honoring our audiences. And I would love to hear from you all: what creative ways have you come up with or encountered for not only getting audiences in the door, but honoring their presence and letting them know how much you appreciate their choice to spend even a short time with you?

 

 

Bookmark this page

Log in to add a bookmark
Thoughts from the curators

A series featuring students sharing their vision for the future of the theatre industry.

School Days

Comments

3
Add Comment

The article is just the start of the conversation—we want to know what you think about this subject, too! HowlRound is a space for knowledge-sharing, and we welcome spirited, thoughtful, and on-topic dialogue. Find our full comments policy here

Newest First

Two loves of my life: baseball and theater! Thanks for writing this, Sam.

About a year ago I had the privilege to take a workshop on theatre created in collaboration with community and the participants included some very established NYC theatre artists. We were asked to line ourselves up on a spectrum that placed our creative priorities somewhere between process on one end and product on the other. This led to some interesting conversation amongst the group as we tried to figure out where we all fit on that line. I found myself negotiating a spot on one side or the other of the artistic director of a well-established NYC theatre company. We were both somewhere in the middle of the group, so you might say were playing it safe. He asked me why I was having so much trouble making up my mind on which side of him I should plant myself. I rambled something about the relationship my company has with its audience. And he retorted, "What if you want to say, 'F**k the audience!'?"

This sentiment, so blunt and callous, left me a bit dumb. As the artistic director of a theatre for young audiences and families, I could never EVER get away with that sentiment driving my creative priorities. And though a few might argue that TYA puts me in a different category, it got me thinking. If artists don't care to honor their relationship with the audience that has set aside time and money to see their work ("F**k 'em!"), how do they expect to survive? It's a sentiment that wreaks of entitlement and self-centered righteousness, no matter if the audience is 8 or 80.

To be fair, it's entirely possible that this artistic director was suggesting that creatives in theatre can't be afraid of taking chances and that is a sentiment I can wholly stand behind. Risk is what puts us on the edge of our seats. But if the either the product or process aren't ultimately intended as a gift for the audience, then I wonder whether I'm being invited by the creator(s) into a deeper relationship with the content/themes/theatre artists/company or I'm simply expected to be impressed.

Baseball teams operate with a lot more money than theatre artists and can afford to give away 20,000 tickets to help seed relationships. If our attitude is "F**k the audience!" we may find ourselves giving away more than that and still scratching our heads why audiences aren't listening.

"I am interested in figuring out ways we might work to make our audiences feel more honored, welcomed, and appreciated before they enter the theater and long after they’ve left." ROCK ON!