The work of 27 July is only a piece of ONOP’s far-reaching story. We also invested in major initiatives designed for fieldwide impact, including a significant contribution to the body of research on the impact of arts participation on social cohesion and wellbeing, as well as a national narrative campaign designed to galvanize investment in this type of programming, which culminated in a convening for 250 attendees in Dallas, Texas in February of this year.
As a foundation for a series on our work, this opening essay explores the expansive potential of artists across all disciplines who choose to create in relationship with community, whether that community is rooted in identity, geography, or shared values. Theatremakers in particular possess a unique set of leadership skills developed through their practice: collaboration, listening, creative problem-solving, narrative framing, and an acute awareness of group dynamics. These are not just artistic tools—they are civic ones as well. These tools can be applied across multiple sectors including health, government, affordable housing, and other economic development initiatives.
How might we position ourselves, our institutions, our companies, and/or our classrooms to meet the moment in ways that lead to meaningful, lasting change?
Theatremakers—directors, designers, writers, performers, creative producers, stage managers—can be important team members and leaders. They can also be vital to strengthening the social cohesion of any working group to help foster even more efficiency towards almost any goal. This isn’t hyperbole; it is based on our own experiences looking back at our development and design work to realize ONOP and 27 July 2024.
The ONOP initiative, which was rooted in civic engagement and cultural collaboration, brought together eighteen communities from across the country—from Providence, Rhode Island to Honolulu, Hawai’i and from Seattle, Washington to Gainesville, Florida. Our work reflects how theatrical practices can serve as foundational tools for leading complex, cross-sector projects that foster connection, creativity, and collective purpose. Our series includes articles that reflect on the importance of community co-design; approaches to values-driven, arts-based research; the costs of pluralism; and, finally, reflections on the political backdrop of this work and the current assault on liberal democracy.
Notably, our approach is not a critique or dismissal of creating art for art’s sake. There is a profound value in simply telling great stories. If your calling is to craft compelling narratives that move, delight, challenge, and inspire, then by all means do it. We need that work. Bring us joy, empathy, sorrow, and laughter. Help us consider questions and make discoveries. We need all of us to make a difference, to bring us together, and to inspire possibilities. We need all of us doing all of the things, especially now amongst the “shock and awe” of intentional cruelty and chaos, desensitization, intense isolation, the dismantling of social infrastructure, and countless other efforts to subjugate the many in favor of the few.
In these times, how might we position ourselves, our institutions, our companies, and/or our classrooms to meet the moment in ways that lead to meaningful, lasting change? We offer this as a beginning of that conversation here, with you, now.
As we developed momentum for this project, we had to illustrate what could happen on 27 July. We had to ignite the imaginations and spectrums of possibility for anyone sitting across from us.
Theatre Skills for Movement Building
Below is an outline of a few of the skills we think carried over to help build this cross-sectional, time-bound collaboration.
Exceptional Collaboration Skills:
Theatremakers, by nature, are collaborators. Our work demands an ability to engage a myriad of partners from a variety of professional backgrounds. We are skilled at managing high levels of complexity and driven to solve problems and discover new opportunities.
Collaboration is a muscle that takes practice to build. Movements, campaigns—any significant group enterprise, really—takes a ginormous amount of energy that can only be stewarded at the hands of an effectively collaborating collective.
Collaborating over time helps one identify the distinct assets of each collaborator that will make meaningful differences to the whole. A theatremaker has the capacity to understand the function and expertise of the highly skilled workers around them and how each role works together to reach a collective end. This nuanced insight powerfully transfers over to supporting large, complex initiatives and lends itself to high adaptability within effective collaborations, ensuring all voices have a seat at the table.
For ONOP, a big moment of transition was growing from our first nine sites into eighteen. For funding reasons primarily, we could not immediately build a cohort of eighteen sites. So we started with nine, working with these cities for nearly a year before onboarding a second group of nine sites. As our funding picture became clearer, we expanded to eighteen but had to be highly intentional about how to integrate nine additional locations onto a moving train. Our central task was to support the cohort in the way one does a production team, to nurture a community of diverse partners, each contributing uniquely to a larger whole.
World Builders and Stewards:
Every theatremaker engaged in a production is actively working to build a world that doesn’t yet exist. We are first and foremost agents of imagination. This is an essential skill in movement building. Before we can construct a new world, we first have to—together—conceive what it will be. Dream of the alternative. Then, we distill and communicate that world to others, each step moving us closer to a world being realized and inspiring others to believe in it.
Along the way, as we developed momentum for this project, we had to illustrate what could happen on 27 July. We had to ignite the imaginations and spectrums of possibility for anyone sitting across from us—be it a potential funder or a local community leader. We had to invite them into the vision. Moreover, as we arrived at eighteen sites and began to nurture the cohesion of this group into a national cohort, 27 July—this dream, this end goal—maintained our focus and served as the “North Star.” As theatemakers, we understand end goals. We understand opening night. No matter the challenge and local or national decision point, this North Star informed and centered the collective goal of achieving a “national premiere” on 27 July.
Comments
The article is just the start of the conversation—we want to know what you think about this subject, too! HowlRound is a space for knowledge-sharing, and we welcome spirited, thoughtful, and on-topic dialogue. Find our full comments policy here.
Loved the article and so looking forward to the coming ones. I was particularly taken with your list of things the performing arts can foster in partnerships with community: fostering social cohesion, connections, creativity and collective purpose, community co-design, values driven, cultural collaboration, building a world that doesn't already exist, innovative communicators, moving from engagement to co-design, not only storytellers but architects of belonging, wellness and shared purpose, and especially that it is a false choice between making great art and making a difference. You might want to take a look at "More Than Entertainment: Democracy and the Performing Arts –– Junior Programs, Inc. (1936 - 1943) Pioneers of Theater for Young Audiences," a book I recently wrote. It is a detailed case study of Junior Programs, Inc., a national theater, opera and ballet touring company that did just about everything on your list –– back in 1936 - '43! Their mission, as articulated in their Credo was to prepare the next generation for their role as active citizens in supporting and sustaining American democracy, and the list you have articulated is a pretty comprehensive list of what it takes to do just that.
I'm a huge fan of this epic undertaking and to your commitment to knowledge sharing around it, thank you!
I"m grateful especially for this sparkly sentiment: "We also reject the false binary that an artist must choose between making great art or making a difference."
As someone who studies economic incentivization in the performing arts I would love your thoughts on whether theatre makers invested in systems change work can also "...reject the false binary that artists who are making a difference can't make a living doing this work."
I'd love to hear more about the contracting of artists and arts intermediaries as perhaps a less visible model that ONOP contributes to public discourse about how artists are finding sustenance in the pandemic-present. .From my understanding ONOP's artistic contracted artists were offered solid wages and secure employment contracts and community liaisons who were artists/culture bearers were compensated to serve as project liaisons. This commitment to remuneration is, to me, another powerful accountability tactic that I'd love to champion as an example.
Maybe this info is forthcoming in a report--if so I'll just sit tight.
In gratitude,
Sarah Wilbur