Embracing Collective Action as a Means of Survival
This essay is part of a series related to the upcoming National Innovation Summit for Arts & Culture.
Are we facing a period in the arts sector where taking collective action will not only be innovative practice, but essential for the survival of struggling nonprofit arts organizations?
I’ve been thinking about this question in advance of the upcoming National Innovation Summit for Arts & Culture, which will feature six twelve-minute talks on “Taking Collective Action” from arts leaders across the country.
I believe that we’re in an era when most arts communities suffer from an oversaturation of nonprofit arts organizations vying for an audience’s time, attention and, most of all, their money. With each organization touting its merits, it has become increasingly difficult to distinguish one from the other especially, I would imagine, for donors and grant-making organizations. The struggle to keep a nonprofit afloat by keeping enough funders and audience members engaged year after year, with so many more technologically advanced outlets for entertainment, is taxing on arts organizations. In the end, it leaves the weaker ones behind and that much closer to the chopping block. The innovator in me struggles to reason why it would not be relatively simple, and beneficial, for arts organizations facing tough times to consider partnering/merging with another organization for a continued existence.
Though I didn’t get my MBA and opted for the more practical path of an MFA (wink), I am certain that understanding mergers and collaborations is essential when considering what to do with an underperforming company in an oversaturated market. Understanding the mutual gain of acquiring the strengths of one business, while minimizing some of the failing components, and combining resources seems like a fair exchange when attempting to ensure an organization’s survival.
Taking Collective Action to Prevent Closures
In the wake of New York City Opera’s (NYCO) official closing, some people I’ve talked to (who don’t work in the arts) have wondered how a failure of this magnitude could be allowed to happen at such a prominent organization with a nearly seventy year history. Of course, this isn’t always the case. Not long ago, an American Tony Award-winning institution, Intiman Theatre, fell on financial hard times, but made an energized, significantly altered comeback shortly thereafter with a revamped organizational structure and business model. Closures of arts organizations are happening at a growing rate around the country with organizations failing to recognize the threat until it is too late. With jobs and a complete loss of their company at stake, I wonder what would happen if more arts organizations looked to collaborate, merge, and partner to save their organizations.
Collective action is not a sign of weakness but rather an indicator for the adaptive change necessary to embrace the next wave of the American theater movement.
Though I have no frame of reference as to whether NYCO was considering a partnership with other arts organizations, I have to believe securing enough resources or business partnerships necessary to continue its ambitious programming was nearly impossible. However, Hartford Children’s Theatre (HCT), which closed its doors in December of 2012, sought out a partnership with Hartford Stage, which expanded its already growing education program with the robust offerings once offered by HCT. Though the HCT would lose its home and staff, the audience it served could be diverted to Hartford Stage, which is carving out its own niche as the leading provider of theatre programming for children and youth in Connecticut. By taking collective action, both companies allow the legacy of HCT to live on with the dependable organizational structure that is provided by Hartford Stage and its community of supporters. With greater focus given to its programming of children’s theater, Hartford Stage gains an audience of youth, and their parents, that they may have not been able to reach on their own.
Collaborating across the Non-Profit / For-Profit Divide
One continuing, and often successful, trend is nonprofit theatres joining up with commercial producers for enhancement money to incubate productions with commercial legs and distribute a hopeful property to a broader (Broadway) audience. One notable beneficiary of this ongoing trend is American Repertory Theatre’s (A.R.T.) nearly frictionless pipeline to Broadway that has launched star-studded productions to NYC from Cambridge, MA like Porgy and Bess, Pippin, and, now, The Glass Menagerie. It really is a brilliant model that, no doubt, benefits the A.R.T. community as well as the theatre-going masses in NYC when artistically dynamic properties can be shared between commercial producers and regional theatres.
If they are lucky, the commercial producers get a hit show, and the regional theatre has the ability to reap some financial gain and prestige for their regional house. This is a collective action that served both parties. For nonprofit arts organizations considering partnerships with fellow nonprofits there are rival mission statements, a well-fought-for audience base, and many other factors that don’t make mergers in nonprofits easy, but consider what could be gained from taking collective action to sustain organizational operations and achieve a greater impact.
The Potential for Collective Action
Some of the benefits I see to merging, collaborating, and partnering are:
- Audiences from both institutions are now empowered to support two organizations for the price of one and remain loyal to supporting the arts.
- Mergers can be used as an opportunity to dissolve some ineffective board seats and acquire more wealth, work, and wisdom from another source.
- Access to artists now joined together and encouraged to think innovatively about potential collaborations within the organization’s programming that might not have occurred otherwise.
- With a renewed mission and a financially more sustainable administrative approach, the hybrid organization has the potential for a broader impact and a stronger message to take to funders and the community at large.
If we are in an era where innovative business acumen will sustain the longevity of financially struggling arts organizations, I would caution more arts leaders to consider the choice between adapting for survival and risking institutional failure. These conversations have got to start soon so that those of us playing catch up on the experience front have arts organizations to head when the time comes, or perhaps nature is destined to take its course and survival of the fittest will make formerly vibrant cultural hubs into grim reminders of the casualties of economic stress.
Shaping the Alternative
While some struggling arts institutions will continue to trim budgets, reevaluate/combine staff positions, and favor less risk in their programming in an effort to appear more attractive to their audiences and donors, there is no hiding when an organization is on the brink of collapse. For some, it’s far too late to implement the extensive planning necessary to save the institution. Collective action is not a sign of weakness but rather an indicator for the adaptive change necessary to embrace the next wave of the American theater movement. Sharing audiences and partnering for the sake of promoting mutually beneficial innovation projects are strategies that arts organizations must recognize as essential to expanding the capabilities of their mission and an enhancement to their brand.
There are of course many challenges associated with a merger-focused approach to saving an arts institution and many industry members may view these efforts as throwing good money after bad. To some extent, I can agree with a more cynical view on letting failing arts institutions fall prey to natural selection, but I find that it is far better to save the few jobs you can and capitalize on reaching a broader audience with a dynamic partnership that can engage and energize a newly formed community of patrons.
The Virtual Summit on ArtsFwd.org will offer six dynamic talks on “Taking Collective Action” from Carlton Turner, Alternate ROOTS, Pamela Young, DANCECleveland, Janeen Bryant, Levine Museum of the New South, Cayenne Harris, Lyric Opera of Chicago, Caroline Woolard and Jen Abrams, OurGoods.org, and JS May, Portland Art Museum. See you at the Summit!